| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2012 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] High performance hoods Date: June 27, 2012 10:28:00 PM EDT Author: Peter Zavon |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Re; amorphous silica Date: June 28, 2012 9:48:52 AM EDT Author: Frank Coppo |
We have been using high efficiency hoods very successfully but I agree with everything Dr. Haugen has said. In our installations, we have taken all of those factors into account so they have worked well. A lab is a complete system. A well designed energy efficient lab works better than a poorly designed conventional lab. To a first approximation, in a properly designed system, a high efficiency hood and a conventional hood are both safe.
As you note, Ralph, most issues are not related to hood containment if face velocities are properly set per manufacturers' and end users' recommendations.Some more relevant issues are:1) Air changes in lab. Unless special detection and flushing technology is present, a small number of HE hoods in a lab may not produce enough air changes to promptly clear a lab proper from accidental spill vapors. Also, lab thermostatic and humidity control may become issues.2) Low lab air changes may also produce an excessive thermal gradient from ceiling to floor.3) Errors in setting hood flows become more significant when nominal flow is a lower number.+ 10 FPM is fairly inoccuous at 100 FPM (+10%), but downright serious at 60 FPM (+18%).4) Solvents tend not to be problems as long as duct concentrations can never exceed 10% of the LEL.I have had other experiences with HE hoods and would be glad to elaborate for any members wishing more detail.Dr. Bob Haugen
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post