I wouldn't consider occupancy sensors switching off unexpectedly to be a hazard if they are properly adjusted and coverage is overlapped. Like any sensor, you will find you get flexibility proportional to the money spent. Consider a system that has sensitivity adjustment--too sensitive and the moving equipment will potentially keep the lights on. You probably want to specify a light control that will allow you to set the delay so it will re-set without shutdown after some arbitrary, non-annoying period to allow people to leave for break without having the lights immediately shut off. You could also specify that the control will shut down banks of lights in delayed sequence or flash an 'imminent shutdown' light to prompt the analyst(s) to move a bit or you could even specify a bank of lights stay off sensor control. I believe that I would require areas containing emergency equipment (eye wash/safety showers, fire blankets, panel boxes, etc.) be off control. You could even equip the system with a manual, occupant-controlled, over-ride to reduce aggravation. I'm having a hard time understanding how the design team is expecting to achieve an energy savings that will give them an ROI on a motion sensor controlled system by controlling only the lights. If the room is lit by fluorescent fixtures the start-up cycle uses more electricity than just leaving them on...I don't know what the time period is and it probably varies with the manufacturer but, it is probably safe to say that if the room is going to be vacant for a half-hour it is cheaper to leave the lights on. Might be that the motion sensors are being used to control HVAC and fume hoods, too. Allay your concerns by talking with the design team to determine if they have properly accommodated the lighting requirements and have addressed whatever scenarios you envision. Also, I'm thinking that lack of sufficient motion in a room with multiple occupancy would be extremely unlikely. I presume it is fairly rare to have analysts working solo. We require solo work to be coordinated with another analyst or building security who will perform periodic checks on that person. Maybe you could consider that a feature...Bob's light went out, better get the AED. jsb -----Original Message----- From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:] On Behalf Of Jeskie, Kimberly B. Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 12:56 To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: [DCHAS-L] occupancy sensors in labs Anyone had any luck or issues with occupancy sensors for lighting in laboratories? I'm looking at a set of laboratory drawings where the design team has inserted them, but it's making my flesh crawl a little thinking about the lights going off when someone's really still. Just wondering if I'm being too paranoid. Kim Kimberly Begley Jeskie, MPH-OSHM Operations Manager Physical Sciences Directorate Oak Ridge National Laboratory (865) 574-4945
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post