From: Richard Palluzi <000006c59248530b-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Flashback prevention
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:57:46 -0600
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: 201911192357.xAJNvr0t007805**At_Symbol_Here**ppa04.princeton.edu


I can't disagree with your desire to exceed minimum safety requirements but I will question if you are really mitigating any credible risks or just making yourself feel safer. I am not convinced these really provide a much safer environment for most instruments

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On Nov 19, 2019 11:00 AM, James Saccardo <James.Saccardo@CSI.CUNY.EDU> wrote:

Steve and Rich,

Irrespective of what the law or code states, we must ask what is reasonable and prudent. It does seem reasonable to put them on the AA, especially since the cost is inexpensive. And if you're going to put them on one flammable gas, you might as well put them on all. The cost is minor and it is a good exercise in safety, and evaluate the piping system. At a time when safety buy-in is meager at best, and in need of a paradigm shift, safety professionals must stand of the side of reasonable and prudent, and then consider Ňare we in complianceÓ. Nothing wrong with exceeding the requirements of the code. You will never measure the incidents that are prevented, but they will always measure the incidents that occur on your watch.

Consequently, what concentration of hydrogen are you using on your GC?

James

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L@PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Richard Palluzi
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:45 AM
To: DCHAS-L@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Flashback prevention

These are only mandatory on welding cylinders. They are designed to protect against a flashback if the hoses fail

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid

On Nov 18, 2019 4:59 PM, Steven Smith <e32srs@MUN.CA> wrote:

Hi All,

One of the instrumentation labs I work in recently had a report suggesting that both the hydrogen and acetylene tanks be equipped with flashback adapters. These are for tanks used for a GC and a Flame AA. The manufacturer, however, suggests that these regulators aren't necessary. I was wondering if anyone on this listserv could comment on whether they use flashback adapters for tanks attached to GC's and FAA instruments.

Thanks,

Steve

Dept of Chemistry

Memorial University

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership@dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership@dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership@dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership@dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.