From: "Moody, Sandra West" <sw04**At_Symbol_Here**TXSTATE.EDU>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Texas School Facilities: Science draft
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 17:11:55 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: DM5PR11MB1644FD5FB2547A314D2C591BDB730**At_Symbol_Here**DM5PR11MB1644.namprd11.prod.outlook.com


Attached is the draft of the proposed Texas School Facilities Standards. I was on the Special Spaces Sub-Committee and sought input from across Texas, especially (chemistry) ACT2 for the science areas.

There are several sections that the TASA Facilities Standards Committee would like input by Dec. 5 before TEA writes the rules & send out for public comment.

Topic: Special Spaces
Science
-Science Lab
-Science Classrooms
-Science Combination Classroom/Lab

Current document: Grades 5-12 are combined for minimum standards.  Does grade 5 science combo room need to be as large as a high school one?  Which of the below do we recommend?
  1. Grade 5 should have its own standards OR
  2. Grades 5,  6-8 and 9-12 should each have their own standards OR
  3. Grades 5-8 should have the same standards & grades 9-12 should have the same standards OR
  4. Grades 5-12 should have the same standards
Prep Rooms
Grades 5-12 are combined for minimum standards.  Any changes here? Does IPC need a built-in fume hood?  ACT2 recommended 2 fume hoods for AP Chemistry, but the committee didn't adopt that recommendation. 
Does middle school prep room need a built in fume hood ($12,000?)

Storage Rooms
Grades 5-12 have same standards?

Chemical Storage
Need to verify no additional requirements are needed other than the NFPA, IFC, & OSHA.

Comparison to School Facilities Standards for Construction on or after January 1, 2004 standards.

For comparison the current standards can be found at

https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=T&app=9&p_dir=F&p_rloc=138259&p_tloc=14963&p_ploc=1&pg=2&p_tac=&ti=19&pt=2&ch=61&rl=1036
(4) Compliance with the standards specified in paragraph (5)(B) - (D) of this subsection will be evaluated based on the school district's intended full-time and/or part-time use of the areas, and not the name of the areas as identified in the construction documents.





One area that is not included for safer teacher work spaces is the need for a NON-ADA sink so prep rooms will have a non-ADA sink that is actually large enough to be useful for more than just pouring liquids down the drain.  

I've also asked if the ADA requirements would allow a portable ADA hood to be a choice so that every hood is the lower less safe ADA deck is not in every room. 


Input can be sent directly to me by Dec. 6. 

Sincerely,
Sandra West

Sandra S. West, Ph.D.
Fellow of American Association for the Advancement of Science
Chair, National Science Teachers Association Safety Advisory Board
Department of Biology
Texas State University
512-245-3360
Cell 210-861-8868

The views expressed in this communiqu=E9 are mine and may not reflect the views of my employer.

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.