From: DCHAS Membership Chair <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] [New post] When does a reduction in injury numbers become statistically significant?
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:24:30 -0400
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: C17109DB-40A0-4DD8-B158-1FC95BE38607**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org


From: Safety Differently <donotreply**At_Symbol_Here**wordpress.com>
Subject: [New post] When does a reduction in injury numbers become statistically significant?
Date: June 25, 2019 at 11:07:41 AM GMT-4
New post on Safety Differently

When does a reduction in injury numbers become statistically significant?

By Dr. Marloes Nitert and Dr. Sidney Dekker 

Those who've been around safety (and particularly safety differently) long enough, know that LTI (Lost Time Injuries) is a lousy safety measure. LTI, after all, was once instituted as a productivity measure, not a safety measure. But LTI is actually quite a silly measure too. This blog shows just how silly it gets, and how foolish (or statistically meaningless) any claims about LTI reduction really are. 

more at ...

http://www.safetydifferently.com/when-does-a-reduction-in-injury-numbers-become-statistically-significant/


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.