Yes!.. Hooray for Massachusetts. Now I don't have to certify to teach the slightly different Mass. Right to Know every year for $20. Instead, I can afford take you out for "coffee and" if you come to NYC.
Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President: Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012 212-777-0062
-----Original Message-----
From: James Kaufman <jim**At_Symbol_Here**LABSAFETY.ORG>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Sent: Wed, Sep 5, 2018 11:57 am
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS criteria in a Non-OSHA state
There is one more group of states that Peter did not mention.
There are about ten states that did not want to be state plan state. Their legislatures simply passed legislation having their state government adopt by reference the OSHA regulations for their public sector. Massachusetts did this in March 2018. It goes into full effect in 2019. ... Jim
Founder/President Emeritus/Board Clerk
The Laboratory Safety Institute (LSI)
A Nonprofit Educational Organization for Safety in Science, Industry, and Education
192 Worcester Street, Natick, MA 01760-2252
508-647-1900 Fax: 508-647-0062
Cell: 508-574-6264 Res: 781-237-1335
Skype: labsafe; 508-401-7406
Teach, Learn, and Practice Science Safely
Tammy,
I assume that you know this, but I'm posting this clarification so that others are not confused. When you say Arkansas is a "non-OSHA" state, you mean that OSHA
rules do not apply to public sector employers in Arkansas. OSHA rules do apply to all private sector employers in Arkansas and indeed, nationwide. And in many states, OSHA rules do apply to public sector employers.
In my experience, some state OSHA programs poorly enforce the rules. Even when public sector employees are covered, some state OSHA programs poorly enforce the
rules for public sector employees.
Many people on this list are associated with public universities. At many public universities in the U.S., OSHA is either not applicable or not enforced. For example,
many public universities are not required to have a Chemical Hygiene Plans or comply OSHA standards for exposures, fall protection, machine guarding, etc. And while I am at it, note also that many states statutorily limit liability for public employers, so
safety professionals at those public universities lose the ability to argue for safety improvements based on compliance or liability; there are administrators who only care about those things. Off my soapbox!
Pete Reinhardt, Yale EHS
203-737-2123
I have summaries of the "ready access" requirement and electronic access here:
As you can see, a web link alone is NOT acceptable, because you can not guarantee Internet connectivity in an emergency situation. There needs to be a backup.
OSHA constitutes minimum best practices, so no, it really is not up for interpretation because you would presumably be hit over the head with it in litigation if you didn't follow it.
======================================================
Safety Emporium - Lab & Safety Supplies featuring brand names
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012
There may already be a thread on this particular topic. If so, please refer me to it.
The entire issue of what access to safety data sheets means is in current debate among some at my institution. We are a "non-OSHA" state but do have a "Right to Know" Act.
Our chemical hygiene plan states that one must " Maintain accurate and timely Safety Data Sheets (SDS's) readily available in the Laboratory to communicate the hazards of hazardous chemical products." Some people have taken this to mean that a web link is
all they need instead of a printed copy of the SDS or a copy on an electronic database.
It is best practice, to have immediate access to an SDS in case of emergency. On-site paper copy is best, followed by an electronic version accessible on-site with an off-site
backup for either. Given the we are not an OSHA state, is immediate access up for interpretation? The employee should be able to request a copy of the SDS, but can someone then do a google search first before handing the requester a copy? My common sense
say "no" but what do I have besides OSHA to argue against this approach. I suspect the "Right to Know" Act, but it does not clearly define immediate access.
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at
membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post