| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2018 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (18 articles) Date: Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 6:51:47 PM Author: Alan Hall <oldeddoc**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM> |
Next by Date: Subject: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (9 articles) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:04:01 -0400 Author: DCHAS Membership Chair |
Perhaps that explains some of their behavior. Might also be another Russian plot.
Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President: Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012 212-777-0062
-----Original Message-----
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
From: Ralph Froehlich <rfroehlich**At_Symbol_Here**HELIXENV.COM>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Sent: Thu, Jul 19, 2018 6:21 pm
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (18 articles)
Yes, the willful wee ones should not be allowed to consume the slime, but adults who have eaten caviar from Russia or Iran have already consumed borax (containing elemental boron), and appear to enjoy it in ever increasing quantities.
Ralph A. Froehlich, CIH, CSP, QEP
Helix Environmental, Inc.
(937) 226-0650 office
rfroehlich**At_Symbol_Here**helixenv.com
The information contained in this electronic transmission is intended solely for the recipient of this email. This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received this email in error, then any distribution, reading, copying, or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by phone or email. Thank you. helix**At_Symbol_Here**helixenv.com
On Jul 18, 2018, at 2:11 PM, "Stuart, Ralph" <Ralph.Stuart**At_Symbol_Here**KEENE.EDU> wrote:
Even when applying an abundance of caution, I cannot imagine that it is right for the BBC to set off a panic amongst uninformed parents about the slime their kids have already handled, unless the claims of toxicity have been established for both the slime precursor AND the slime itself.
The BBC is not the source of this concern; the British tabloid press has been raising this alarm, in a less balanced way for about a year.
I'm not sure that consulting a chemist is the appropriate approach for the average member of the public; I believe that this is a medical question rather than a chemical one. I'm not sure that the press understands the difference, though; sometimes it seems that they think anyone with a lab coat can answer a health question...The responsible thing to do is to consult a chemist before making too wild claims in the press.
- Ralph
Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO
Environmental Safety Manager
Keene State College
603 358-2859
ralph.stuart**At_Symbol_Here**keene.edu
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post