| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2018 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4% vs. 5% hydrogen Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 9:15:48 AM Author: "Bell,Martin" <mwb32**At_Symbol_Here**drexel.edu> |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4% vs. 5% hydrogen Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 17:45:20 -0400 Author: James Kaufman |
This ISO method is intriguing…and expensive ($162). I’m curious if it might be suitable for screening refrigerants/HFCs/HFOs for use as a flash point suppressant in an otherwise flammable chlorinated solvent
(or solvent mixture containing a splash of IPA for water take-up). Any constructive feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Dan Nowlan
Chemist, R&D
Berryman Products, Inc..
(817) 640-2376, ext. 147
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU]
On Behalf Of Whitney Rochelle Hess
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 8:38 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4% vs. 5% hydrogen
Hi Debbie,
This is related to the molar heat capacity of the inert gas. The larger the molar heat capacity, the greater the inerting effect. Argon has a smaller molar heat
capacity compared to nitrogen, so a lower concentration of H2 in argon would support flame propagation. ISO 10156 is a good reference for this.
Best,
Whitney
_______________________________
Whitney Hess, PhD
EHS Coordinator
Microsystems Technology Laboratories
MIT, Room 39-213
Phone: 617-253-8567
Email: wrhess**At_Symbol_Here**mit.edu
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and
Safety [DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU] on behalf of Debbie M. Decker [dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 7:34 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] 4% vs. 5% hydrogen
Hi all:
Riddle me this – why is 5% hydrogen in nitrogen considered NOT flammable and 4% in argon considered flammable? Tried to reach Praxair but no one is home.
This makes absolutely no sense to me.
Thanks,
Debbie
Debbie M. Decker, CCHO, ACS Fellow
Past Chair, Division of Chemical Health and Safety
Councilor and Programming Co-Chair
University of California, Davis
(530)754-7964
(530)304-6728
dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu
Birkett's hypothesis: "Any chemical reaction
that proceeds smoothly under normal conditions,
can proceed violently in the presence of an idiot."
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at
membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at
membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post