Hi Beth,
I couldn't resist highlighting the continuing reinforcement of the theme of this thread-..
weren't converted incorrectly
The real blunder occurred when evidently no one thought to question the erroneous procedure. I would hope trained technicians are thinking on the job. The revised procedure clearly should have elicited questions from those performing the work.
Dan
---------------------------------
Dan Blunk PhD, REA 831.459.3541
Environmental Programs Manager
Environmental Health & Safety Office
University of California Santa Cruz
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Beth Shepard
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:54 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Typo may have led to radioactive material leak
Good morning, Jyllian--
I also enjoy your work. And by no means was my comment intended to excuse the fact that a small typo created this significant safety issue.
The fact that spelling/proofreading errors rampant in our world of spell-checking/texting devices is something that everyone creating critical documents (SOPs, production records, specifications, technical documents, etc.) should keep in mind.
The other example that always comes to my mind is the spacecraft (Mars Climate Orbiter) that crashed because the units of measure weren't converted incorrectly. The original data calculations were in metric units & the computer program converted them into English units, so after all that work/time/money, the spacecraft crashed into Mars instead of entering orbit.
Beth
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Larson, Jay <Jay.Larson**At_Symbol_Here**science.doe.gov> wrote:
Jyllian, I enjoy all your work, very helpful. Thanks! Jay
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Jyllian Kemsley
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:14 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Typo may have led to radioactive material leak
FWIW, I don't usually use spell check programs--they flag too many technical terms.
But yes, I had several people point out the typo today, within minutes of it posting. I'm grateful for so many interested readers!
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Beth Shepard <beth.shepard**At_Symbol_Here**sial.com> wrote:
And spelling/proofreading errors are rampant in these days of spell-check on computers...
A case in point from Ms. Kemsley's article:
"Perhaps I've been exposed to a few too many horrified "ingredient X in your food is an ingredient in Y industrial product!" chemophobia cries, but I'm not convinced that just having the ingredients in the same please means that you have a drum-sized bomb."
Based upon context, this should have been "...in the same place..." (not please).
Beth Shepard
This message and any files transmitted with it are the property of Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the person or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post