From: Ralph Stuart <rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Colorado methanol fire case
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:17:20 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 06776886-6210-4C02-81B8-506F61389105**At_Symbol_Here**me.com
In-Reply-To <8D1BF2E3C97EF4C-1E88-1322D**At_Symbol_Here**webmail-va083.sysops.aol.com>


>In my opinion, those who urge others to ‰?? use common sense‰?? are saying things equivalent to ‰??be more careful‰?? as a future action in an accident investigation.

I think that it also assumes an "information deficit" model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_deficit_model
to explain behavior. I believe that the scientific communication researchers are finding that that is not a good explanation for public behavior, particularly around chemicals. There is an element of technical explanation that has to include cultural factors as well in order to be effective.

I wonder if one reason that the number of methanol fires is gaining notice is that there are a lot of "cool" demonstrations by amateurs on the web that science teachers feel that they have to emulate or compete with? Personally, I'm not clear that fires and explosions are the best way to explain chemistry, but I know that it is a popular approach with some educators.

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart
rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.