From: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Cotton content of jeans
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:23:09 -0700
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 00d001ce8cd4$1dc13600$5943a200$**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com
In-Reply-To


Kim

 

Here are relevant data

Heat of Combustion kJ/g

 

Gasoline 47

Polypropylene 46

Polyester 31

Cotton 16

 

Here are ignition temps

 

Relative summary of the flammability properties of fibers:
 

Fiber

Heat of Combustion
(Kcal/g)

Ignition Temperature 
(=B0C)

Cotton

3.9

255

Rayon

3.9

420

Nylon

7.9

575

Polyester

5.7

560

Wool

4.9

600

Zipro Wool (Treated with Zirconium, a heavy metal)

 -

 -

Source: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) (Australia)

The conclusions are fairly obvious – Polypro and Polyester are solidified gasoline. Mixtures dilute the energy.

 

When I go to refineries and other “increased risk” locations, I wear only cotton.

 

In my reactives workshop, I discuss garment choice, in particular bras, underpants, and tee shirts!

It is fun to watch the facial reactions…..

 

I consider this one of the overlooked topics in lab/ pilot plant safety – I learned this lesson at production plants.

 

nl

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Standard confidentiality terms apply

 

NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.

ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.

PO Box 152329

SAN DIEGO CA 92195

011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)

www.chemical-safety.com

 

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeskie, Kimberly B.
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:23 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Cotton content of jeans

 

Here, scrubs are reserved for certain groups of people, but that’s a good point. It’s something I wouldn’t have thought to recommend for lab workers just because they are normally associated with these specific groups.

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Laurence Doemeny
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 11:50 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Cotton content of jeans

 

Why do they need to be jeans?  How about a set of cotton scrubs.  Inexpensive and serve the purpose.

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeskie, Kimberly B.
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 3:45 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Cotton content of jeans

 

Doing some back to school shopping this weekend, I had an aha moment.  My traditional go to “uniform” for doing laboratory inspections has always included jeans.  It’s becoming very difficult to find women’s jeans that don’t include some percentage of polyester and spandex (e.g. the magic ratio appears to be something like 70ish% cotton, 2% spandex and the balance being polyester).  My assumption is that these blends would not hold up well to contact with corrosives and are not something you would want on your body during a fire situation.  I’m wondering if this is something that organizations have had to factor into their training in recent years and if anyone has seen actual data about how the blends hold up against these kinds of hazards.

 

Kim

 

Kimberly Begley Jeskie, MPH-OSHM

Director, Integrated Operations Support Division

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

(865)574-4945 (work)

(865)919-4134 (cell)

 

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.