I agree that Nomex is superior to FR. Nomex IIIA meets NFPA 1975, 1506, 70E, and 2112.
Sent from my iPhone
George S. Smith III
Thermo Fisher Scientific
On 2013-01-28, at 9:15 AM, "NEAL LANGERMAN"
In our industrial plants, the general rule is that FR cotton garments are
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.
Russ,
I will look for the literature on this, but to quickly answer about the
I have seen some literature on all but the human toxicity of the treated FR
Thanks,
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-----Original Message-----
So the discussion in the UC Lab Safety world now includes flame retardant
I would greatly appreciate being pointed toward information that would help
How good are FR coats in a real flammable liquid fire? How does that compare
Literature that may help us in answering these kinds of questions is what I
Sincerely,
Russell Vernon, Ph.D.
Director
Environmental Health & Safety
University of California Riverside
900 University Ave
EH&S
www.ehs.ucr.edu
russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**ucr.edu
direct 951.827.5119
admin 951.827.5528
fax 951.827.5122
after hours emergency contact UCPD 951.827.5222
________________________________________
From: Melissa Charlton-Smith
Nitric acid is aqueous, so how can it be flammable (in the Tripoli
Possibly someone who KNOWS told the reporter that it's an oxidizer and at
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post
replaced every two years My own Nomex coveralls are really beat up but
still provide good flash protection -
Nomex is definitely superior
--------
Standard confidentiality terms apply
ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.
PO Box 152329
SAN DIEGO CA 92195
011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)
www.chemical-safety.com
-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of
Robin M. Izzo
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:49 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Flame Resistance & Lab Coats
treated coats vs. Nomex, the companies that sell the treated coats say that
the fire resistance begins to fail after two years. The Nomex is more
expensive, but the fire resistance does not fade.
coats.
Robin
Robin M. Izzo, M.S.
Associate Director, EHS
Princeton University
609-258-6259 (office)
~ Mark Twain
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of
Russell Vernon
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:01 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Flame Resistance & Lab Coats
lab coats and human/environmental potential consequences.
us more intelligently discuss these concerns:
to non-FR lab coats?
Are the treated cloth lab coats inferior to the "Nomex" type?
Do the modern treated FR coats demonstrate any human toxicity or
environmental adverse effects?
am asking you to help me find.
-Russ
Riverside, CA 92521
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] on behalf of
Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:50 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)
Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)
Date: January 25, 2013 1:33:49 PM EST
story)
certain concentrations can cause combustion in contact with combustible
materials....and the reporter took the short root to "it's flammable".