Suzanne

__________________________

Suzanne Deguire

Directrice

Direction de la prévention et de la sécurité - Division SST

Université de Montréal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, local G-535-2

C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3J7

Tél.: (514) 343-5801

Fax: (514) 343-2168

Page web: www.dps.umontreal.ca

Est-ce nécessaire d'imprimer ce message?

Avis de confidentialité : Ce document électronique (incluant tout fichier ou élément qui y est joint) est destiné uniquement à la personne ou à l'entité à qui il est adressé. Il peut contenir de l'information protégée ou des renseignements confidentiels assujettis au secret professionnel. Si vous avez reçu ce document par erreur, veuillez le détruire et avoir l'obligeance de communiquer avec moi, afin que j'apporte les correctifs requis. Toute distribution, reproduction ou autre utilisation de ce document par un destinataire non visé est interdite.

Karen:

1. The first step is to make sure that your policies are in writing and are distributed to all TAs. I sent you a copy of my book, "Laboratory Safety and Management: A Handbook for Teaching Assistants". In this book, I include the various duties and responsibilities that are part of the contractual obligation of the TA. The writing should be clear and concise to avoid any confusion of "recommend" or "should" or "mandatory". Our TAs appreciate having this information in writing and in one document. This book should also inform the TAs of the consequences of NOT following the safety policies of the department, which brings me to...

2. Meet with departmental administration (i.e., chair or head and safety committee) and hammer out a clear and concise course of action for those who willingly refuse to follow the safety policies in lab. Also, the administration must appoint someone in charge of oversight of all of the TAs in the labs. A TA who was not following the safety rules would be directed to this person and he/she would meet with the TA. The first meeting might involve counseling, much as you would expect with any staff member who has made a mistake and not followed policy. The TA would be reminded of the importance of following the rules and advised that a second meeting would not be in their best interest. If there is a second meeting, the impact of their behavior on their continued employment would be discussed. Usually, this meeting is sufficient, and a third meeting is not necessary. Again, any laboratory safety program MUST have the support at the top of the administrative ladder.

3. Make the graduate student's research advisor aware of the fact that this student is becoming a liability in the labs, NOT an asset, by not following the rules. I have observed spectacular behavior modifications after the research advisor was informed of the situation.

4. Never give up.  The situation will improve, but it will require training. All of my TAs must attend mandatory training (by me) and I use photos and anecdotal discussion to drive home my points about setting the professional example in the lab so that their students will follow their example.

As always, you can call me if you wish to discuss further.

Best regards,

Barbara

>>> "Humphrey, Karalyn J." <Karalyn_Humphrey**At_Symbol_Here**BAYLOR.EDU> 1/25/2012 11:54 AM >>>