Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:49:39 -0700
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: David H Silberman <davidhs**At_Symbol_Here**STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Definition of "tepid"
In-Reply-To: <8EB66FFCD07EBA40B48271ABD10E080B070114F5**At_Symbol_Here**rockies.xenotechllc.com>

< div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Be really careful with this one...

California does not enforce the current ANSI s tandard (Cal/OSHA's current Standard refers to ANSI Z358.1-1 981 and there is no mention of the word "tepid"). 

So here's a question: How many of you have actually "washed you r eyes" for even just a few minutes using the pre-tepid systems?  If n ot, you may want to try it!  From one who has (as a test, not a necess ity and over a sink with a drain), it's not that bad and I readily understo od the need for "hands-free"devices: holding one's eyelids open and grittin g down (make a wooden "chomp" dowel available?) does work and my eyes got u sed to the temperature within a minute or two.

David


David H. Silberman
Directo r, Health and Safety Programs
Stanford University School of Medicine
251 Campus Drive West, Room X-104
Mail Code 5459
Stanford, CA 94305
Direct Line: 650-723-6336
Office Line: 650-723-0110
FAX Line: & nbsp;  650-736-0179

Mobile:      650-924-0962


From: "Brady Arnold" <barnold**At_Symbol_Here**XENOTECHLLC.COM>
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Sent: Tuesda y, August 16, 2011 8:53:22 AM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Definition of "tepid"

60 F may be too cold and hypothermia could still be a concern for extended washing. However, 100F is just above body temp, it should be p retty good for an eyewash.

-Brady

 

Brady P. Arnold

< p class="MsoNormal">Engineer III / Safety Office r

XenoTech LLC

phone (913) 227-7143

fax       (913) 227-7199

barnold**At_Symbol_Here**xenotechllc.com

 

 < /p>

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Debbie M. Decker
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:26 AM< br>To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Definition of "tepid"

 

I know we=E2=80=99ve beaten this one to death already but I wasn =E2=80=99t paying attention and now I need the collective brain.  I fo und ANSI says that "tepid=" is between 60 and 100F.  Bu t I seem to recall other advice that suggests this is too wide of a range =E2=80=93 60F is uncomfortably cold and 100F is far too hot for an eyewash.

 

What do you g uys think?

 

Tha nks,

Debbie

--------- --------------------------

 

Debbie M. Decker, Campus Chemical Safety Offi cer
Environmental Health and Safety
University of California, Davis1 Shields Ave.
Davis, CA  95616
(530)754-7964/(530)681-1799 (c ell)

(530)752-4527 (FAX)
dmd ecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu
Co-Conspirator to Make the World A
Better Place -- Visit www.Hero icStories.com and join the conspiracy

 

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including any attachment, is for the sole use of the i ntended recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please contact the sen der by reply e-mail and delete and destroy all copies of the original messa ge.

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.