| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2011 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Chemical Safety headlines from Google (9 articles) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:11:25 -0400 Author: Ralph Stuart |
Next by Date: Subject: CHO Certification Exam Study Aid Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 19:52:33 +0000 Author: "CHEATOM, WAKEELAH" |
In addition to checking local codes (as has been mentioned a couple of time s already), you need to look at NFPA 45 as well. Don A. Long CAIH, CEAS I Southwest Research Institute Laboratory Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility PO Box 20130 White Hall, AR 71612 870-541-4930 -----Original Message----- From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Ro bin M. Izzo Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:45 PM To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] When is non-water fire suppression required in a che mical stockroom? You need to check with your local codes. The international codes do not re quire this and we have not specified any chemical storage area with a non-a queous system, not even our chemistry department stockroom. There are other factors you'll need to consider if you're going with a CO2 or other system, including the ventilation and what to do it the system act ivates while it is occupied. Based on the discussions we've had with lab building designers for three ne w lab buildings over the last four years, it does not appear to be conventi onal to go with such a system. The international fire code lists storage q uantity limits based on the presence (or lack) of water-based fire suppress ion and use of flammable liquid storage cabinets. Another option is to look at a pre-action system, particularly if you're co ncerned about the possibility of leaks. - Robin Robin M. Izzo, M.S. Associate Director, EHS Princeton University 609-258-6259 (office) How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling i t a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg. ~ Abraham Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Fe rm Barret A Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:08 AM To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: [DCHAS-L] When is non-water fire suppression required in a chemica l stockroom? We are in the design phase of creating a new, modest-size chemical stockroo m, which is considered an occupied space. Is it current standard to have f ire suppression that uses a non-aqueous agent? Does it depend on what chem icals are present? It will definitely house general organics, acids and fl ammables. Is there a prevailing design philosophy I can present to the dec ision-makers? ________________________________ This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential infor mation that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message i n error or are not the intended recipient, you should not retain, distribut e, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the e-mai l and any attachments or copies.
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post