As long as the problem is fixed, photographing should not be an issue and may be helpful in the future as the photo, plus the other documentation, plus documentation of the fix (including photo) can be a helpful demonstration of good faith efforts to fix problems when found. Of course, if the problem is not fixed, then any documentation - whether photo or merely a text description - can be used as ammunition by a regulator or litigant. But if that is your concern, you have better not commit any observations of non-compliance to writing, forget about the photo question. In my opinion, it is better to communicate the issue clearly with the written word and photos or drawings where they are helpful, thereby more likely getting the problem corrected, than, for fear of citation or litigation, to communicate less clearly or not at all. I don't imagine regulators care much for "willful ignorance" in any case. Peter Zavon, CIH Penfield, NY PZAVON**At_Symbol_Here**Rochester.rr.com > -----Original Message----- > From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] > On Behalf Of paracelcusbombastusvon**At_Symbol_Here**juno.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 12:58 PM > To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU > Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Photographing non-compliance > > I do it all the time as a part of all my EHS inspections of > all the plants I visit. The picture is next to a written > description of the issue and the applicable > OSHA/EPA/NFPA/building code/etc regulation. The report is > distributed to the plant manager, vice-president, and ceo. > Most appreciate the picture since it points to the issue at the time. > Lynn K > > >
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post