Thanks everyone. I've shared your information with the researchers and now it's "wait and see" what they decide to do. Wendy On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM,
wrote: > the NJ DOH is a wonderful source. And most importantly, it tells you what > is NOT known about the toxicity of the 1600+ chemicals it provides data on. > note that paraoxone has never been tested for carcinogenicity or > reproductive damage. So many people think all pesticides have had a lot of > testing when most have not. > > Monona > > > > In a message dated 10/20/2010 3:07:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > demer**At_Symbol_Here**EMAIL.ARIZONA.EDU writes: > > > See: http://nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/1457.pdf > > > > > > -- Wendy Campbell, CSP Occupational Health and Safety Officer Environmental Health and Safety Boise State University 1910 University Drive Boise, Idaho 83725-1826 Office: (208) 426-3303 Fax: (208) 426-3343 Thanks everyone.=A0=A0 I've shared your information with the researcher s and now it's "wait and see" what they decide to do.
WendyOn Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, < span dir="ltr"><ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**cs.com&g t; wrote:
the NJ DOH is a wo nderful source.=A0 And most importantly, it tells you what is NOT known abo ut the toxicity of the 1600+ chemicals it provides data on.=A0 note that pa raoxone has never been tested for carcinogenicity or reproductive damage. =A0 So many people think all pesticides have had a lot of testing when most have not.
Monona
--
Wendy Campbell, CSP
Occupational Health and Safety Officer
Environmental Health and S afety
Boise State University
1910 University Drive
Boise, Idaho 8 3725-1826
Office: (208) 426-3303
Fax:=A0 (208) 426-3343
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post