d; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;-webkit-line-break: after-white-space'>
Can’t say I’m familiar with the chemistry.=A0 Ev en so, I would turn these questions back at the lab(s) involved:
What were the intermediates/byproducts produced?< /span>
What was being evaporated at the hood? =A0At the oven?=A0
I question the hot plate boil-off and the convection oven fo r solvent.=A0 (If flammable atmospheres, then intrinsically safe electrical components required.)
(Did the convection oven vent to the room?)
Solvent/vapor recovery would be more robust – required at larger scale.
Does the person involved appreciate:=A0 p>
Consequences were limited in this case by unwitting accidents of scale and access.
I realize this is unrefined, but this is where I would start with the ideas/questions.
-Nick
From: DCHAS-L Discu
ssion
List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Perry Cooper
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 11:04 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Sol-gel drying process
Sharing an incident. Anyone want to chip in on recommendatio
ns? J
General lab exhaust through the fume hood. Some equipment exhausted with localized flex duct but not the oven.
Adjacent areas complained of strong alcohol odor.
“….. intent to prepare a batch of fine par ticulate size aluminum oxide via the sol gel process. The components were an organometallic (aluminum sec- butoxide), a solvent (2-propanol) and water. 1.5l of 2-propanol was placed in a porcelain-lined steel container. 4.5kg of aluminum sec-butoxide was added to the solvent while mixing. After these components were thoroughly mixed, 1.1l of water was add ed resulting in the formation of AlOH particles from the organic precursor. At this point, the composition was a viscous slurry. In order to redu ce the solvent content, the container was placed on a hot plate inside the fum e hood. The composition was heated (temperature unknown but estimated to be 70-80=B0C) for approximately 4 hours. At the end of this period, most of the solvent had evaporated, leaving a slightly moist “cake”. In order to remove the remaining solvent, the container was taken to room xxxx x and placed in a convection oven. I partially covered the container with a l id to allow venting and to prevent any swirling debris from contaminating the material. Oven temperature was set at 130=B0C and the general exhaust in th is room was turned on. My intent was to let the material dry overnight and I l eft for the day. When I returned the following day, I checked the oven and it w as apparent that there had been an accident at some point after I left. I later learned that there had been a small explosion and fire. I believe the fire was confined to the oven and was extinguished by covering the containe r with the lid. The oven door was bent when it swung open and contacted the control enclosure but no other damage is apparent. In the past, I have used these same procedures and equipment to make similar compositions without incident….”
Regards,
Perry
________
_______________________
The Johns Hopkins University
Homewood Campus Safety Office
Perry D. Cooper, MS, HEM, CCHO
Manager - HSE - JHU
Health, Safety & Environment
www.hopkinsmedicine.org/hse<
/a>
3400 N. Charles Street
G04 Wyma
n Park
Bldg
This transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. Be
advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of this
information is strictly prohibited.
Baltimore, MD 21218
Office: 410-516-2345
Fax: 410-516-4314
www.jhu.edu/safety
_______________________________
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post