> >I do, however, wonder about the references to meth labs. These are illegal operations and don=92t really seem to be in the prevue of this list. > I include the meth lab references for a couple of reasons: 1) the "technology" associated with them seems to be changing rapidly as they appear to be showing up in a wider variety of places (cars, backpacks, etc.) 2) concern about meth labs is a key component of the way protocols are written for emergency responders reacting to a hazmat situation 3) as a reminder that chemical security issues are becoming increasingly important in the pubic's mind for at least one specific reason These and other illegal activities help to explain the genesis of some of the regulations we're asked to deal with... - Ralph Ralph Stuart secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Secretary Division of Chemical Health and Safety American Chemical Society
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post