Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:21:24 -0400
Reply-To: ILPI <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: ILPI <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>
Subject: Re: Flash chromatography
In-Reply-To: <4845F31BF5114DA4A7D2FC9A88B22AFC**At_Symbol_Here**AdminFin.ADS.umass.edu>

As most folks performing column chromatography will avail themselves to house nitrogen or air supplies (if available), it makes sense to install pressure regulators on at least some of those fixtures.

As a direct result of the list discussion, we have now added several models of pressure-regulated gas fixtures to those that we carry.   These fixtures can be used with air, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, nitrogen, nitrous oxide and/or oxygen.  They can be used in retrofit installations or specified for new installations.  Full information, along with links to the product specification drawings can be found on our web site.   The specific models germane to flash chromatography and related applications are:

http://www.safetyempo rium.com/?L2873-771WSA (deck mounted)
http://www.safety emporium.com/?L3173-366-158WSA (panel/wall mounted)
http://www.safetyempo rium.com/?L3173-771WSA (overhead mounted)
http://www.safety emporium.com/?L740FCN-774VR-QR (compact fume hood mounted)
http://www.safetyem porium.com/?L740FCN-784-QR (recessed fume hood mounted)

All of these fixtures feature quick-connect couplings on the outlets, so users don't have to worry about hoses popping off or having to use hose clamps or wire as is commonly done in labs. 

As an additional safety measure, I'd suggest putting a label/sign by any pressure-regulated fixture with wording such as DO NOT EXCEED xx PSI WHEN PRESSURIZING GLASSWARE.   If you have room, you might put additional warnings about safety shields, face shields etc.

Actually, I believe that last suggestion is so good, if any DCHAS members decide to order such fixtures through us, we'll create custom industrial-duty vinyl labels that incorporate whatever safety/usage wording you want at no extra charge.

Regards,

Rob Toreki


On Jun 24, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Yung Morgan wrote:

To  DCHAS members.
Thank you so much for all who responded to my question on Flash Chromatography and safety procedures utilized in research to prevent glassware breaking.
Enclosed are a few samples of answers if you are interested in this process.
Again, thank you for your help. You are a terrific group, Have a great Summer! .   .  

Yung Morgan, MsPH
Laboratory Safety
Industrial Hygiene Services
Environmental Health and Safety
117 Draper hall
UMASS,Amherst MA 01003
phone (413)  545-2682
Fax  (413) 545-2600
email : pmorgan**At_Symbol_Here**ehs.umass.edu

My Question :

Dear DCHAS group,
I was wondering if anyone had an idea or can direct me to literature on =93Flash chromatography=94 whereby air is directed the solvent column to speed up its elution of the compound wanted. One of our researchers had gotten a cut from the glass column breaking and cutting him on the arm.
Again, when asked, he said: everybody uses this technique! Being an old analytical chemist, I did not remember this method. However, an organic professor had informed me that this method is also called =93Flash chromatography=94 and recommended the air pressure to be no more than 20PSIG and to wrap the column in plastic tapes to protect from breakage! . The lab in question use air spigots on lab benches which runs more than 20PSI if fully opened.
Any thoughts or comments you all have are welcome. Thank you in advance and enjoy your summer

 I asked the safety coordinator for our largest Chem research group, & his answer is: 

Flash chromatography is best done in a fume hood because of potential exposure to solvent vapors if done outside of a fume hood.  We do use "house air" but the spigot is not opened all the way.  Just enough to get the air flowing to the column. Flash chromatography column should be wrapped with tape just in case of breakage due to stress on glass or air pressure.  To control the air flow, we use a flow control adapter for chromatography that is available from chemglass (Catalog # is CG-1195) which enable the control of air flow and thus prevents column breakage due to excess air pressure.  If the control valve is use properly, column breakage is rare. The columns should be inspected before each use and columns that show any signs of stress on the glass should not be used.  Since, column breakage during use is always a possibility, gloves, safety glasses or goggles and a lab coat should always be worn when doing flash chromatography. 

Kim Auletta
Lab Safety Specialist
Hi Yung,

I remember this being called LPLC (Low Pressure Liquid Chromatography) when I did my under grad research about 8-9 years a go in organic research.  

I used a glass column that looked like the one in Figure 5 that in the Flash Chromatography PDF and also packed it slightly differently.  Our column was about 3ft tall, a 10 gram column.   The top was tapered to a smaller opening to fit a rubber stopper with a center hole., here we connected our compressed air tubing from a cylinder.  The stopper was held in place with 2 rubber bands (one pass each, crisscrossed), which gave enough flexibility for the stopper to blow out if too much pressure built up in the column.  At the air cylinders, we set the regulator to 18 psi to control the pressure being delivered to the column.  To add additional solvent/mobile phase, their pressure was shut off and the stopper was removed from the top and with a funnel, the mobile phase was slowly added.  

I do remember the columns, even though a thicker glass, were extremely fragile and expensive.  They will break very easily, with the slightest bump, over-tightening of the clamps, or too much pressure pumped in (though it should be step with a way to relieve or avoid this). For some protection, I have seen sleeves, plastic/poly- type material that slides over the outside glassware to prevent flying glassware if it shatters or explodes. 

Chris Suznovich
I'm an old chemist and used to do tons of "flash chromatography". I don't ever remember reading about it, just learned it from my lab mates in school but continued to use it in industry in the late 80s. We used N2, not air. No regulator, just whatever came out of the hood N2 tap. You could make it faster or slower by changing the pressure. I never had one break but the rapid movement of solvent through a glass column can build up quite a static charge - enough to stand the hair on your arms on end and cause your solvent stream coming out the bottom to veer towards your hand if you put it near by. Scary when running ether columns. I always did mine in the hood but many people did them on the bench top. (I know, I'm really old.) I would wrap copper wire around my column and attach it to the plumbing to help but since it was insulated by the glass, it was of limited value.
 
Now, as a safety person, I would recommend plastic netting on the column and reservoir to contain breakage, a regulator on the gas to control pressure and some method to ground the whole thing. And, of course, doing it in a hood.
 
Eventually, we moved away from flash and began to use the automated fraction collector chromatography systems like the Foxy sold by Isco (they may have been sold again and sell under a different name). It is easier since you didn't have to stand there and keep changing the collection flask and refill the reservoir. Tell your guy to go buy one. I'm sure he can find used ones if he doesn't want to buy new.
Hi Yung,
I believe that your researchers are referring to the standard =93flash chromatography=94 used in organic synthesis labs.
See the following link for a copy of the technique as originally described by Clark Still of Columbia University (Still, W.C., Kahn, M., Mitra, A., J. Org. Chem, Vol. 43, No. 14, 1978, p. 2923).
Many labs have begun using automated medium pressure flash systems and pre-packed silica gel columns in plastic cartridges (see Teledyne ISCO, Biotage, and Interchim as example manufacturers of these systems), but the flash column as originally described in 1978 still has significant utility today.
In my experience, 10 psi is about the practical limit for this technique, above which you may be putting significant strain on the glass columns.  Sometimes researchers are tempted to put more pressure on the glass to elute the material faster, or if plugs occur in the column.  I would definitely recommend pressure regulators be installed in the air lines.
Steve
This is a very common technique and most investigators that I know use compressed nitrogen tanks with regulators that easily regulate the pressure down to a usable level and you don=92t have to worry about contamination from house air lines, i.e. water, dust, etc.  Further, the compressed nitrogen line is usually run through a oil bubbler  as a further verification of low pressure.  I have also seen some researchers cut a small slit in the tygon tubing to prevent the pressure from getting too high.
Hope this is helpful,
Adam O. Barden
Washington State University
Disclaimer/whatever: my company is a Chemglass (now Chemglass Life Sciences) distributor.
There are older chromatography columns out there made out of standard wall tubing.  Flash chromatography first came into vogue the late 1970's, so it's possible you may have some thinner wall ones circulating at your organization.  A true flash chromatography column should be constructed out of medium wall tubing to provide an extra margin of safety.   Chemglass not only makes theirs out of medium wall tubing, they are also available from the factory with a clear plastic coating by special order (if anyone wants quotes on these, contact me off list).
Many columns use a fritted glass disc at the bottom.  The maximum differential pressure rating on those is 15 psi.  So 15 or 20 psi should be established as the safe working limit, yes.
Relatively safe pressure control on columns can be achieved by making sure that the gas flow control adapter at the top is not secured **too** tightly.  A Keck clip or such is more than enough to secure the adapter, but can still provide some pressure relief.    It is, of course, more reliable and desirable to provide a pressure gauge and/or some sort of relief system teed into the gas supply line so that researchers know exactly how much pressure they are achieving.   The best solution would be a regulator can be used on the gas/air supply line.
Your written SOP for chromatography should include a discussion of the pressurization hazards, "safe" pressure ranges, and how to mitigate the risks.   The SOP should also explain that proper PPE (lab coats with sleeves, goggles) and engineering controls (fume hood sashes, blast shields etc.) can also go a long way in minimizing any injury should an accident occur.
Rob Toreki
< /o:smarttagtype>

  =======================================================
Safety Emporium - Lab & Safety Supplies featuring brand names
you know and trust.  Visit us at http://www.SafetyEmporium.com
esales**At_Symbol_Here**safetyemporium.com  or toll-free: (866) 326-5412
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.