| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2008 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with gas station pump hazards? Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:24:33 -0400 Author: List Moderator |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with gas station pump hazards? Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:17:53 -0400 Author: ILPI |
A reply to a question from last week... >I had a phone call from someone who was injured at a self-service gas pump in rural Georgia. From: sstepenuck**At_Symbol_Here**ne.rr.com Subject: Anyone familiar with... Date: September 9, 2008 5:18:15 PM EDT (CA) I forwarded that email to my kids and to one of my cousins who has much experience in industry. Here, with a couple of minor grammatical mistakes corrected, and with full disclaimers on my and his part, is his reply: I do suspect urban legend here or at least some incorrect facts. I've worked around fuel dispensing equipment all my life and never heard of such a thing. Most modern fuel pumps aren't really pumps, they=92re only metering dispensers because the actual pump is in the underground tank. So for technical accuracy, I will use the word "dispenser" as opposed to "pump" even though we all know them as pumps. Most modern dispensers have an overhead manifold with a hose attachment fitting sticking through an opening in the overhead sheet metal. =46rom that fitting hangs a very short piece of hose which ends with a "break-away" coupler. =46rom the break-away coupler there is usually the longer hose with nozzle. The purpose of the break-away coupler is for the nitwit who drives away with the nozzle still in the car. The break-away is designed to be the weakest link in the hose assembly so that it will part first when faced with the tension created by a departing car. Even so, it takes a fair amount of force to cause a break away. Most people could not part one simply by yanking because they are not strong enough. The break-away has an internal valve which will slam shut in the event it is parted. They are quite reliable and are rigorously tested and they immediately stop all fuel flow. There might be a momentary "psst" of fuel but no great wide-open spraying like you might have with a garden hose nozzle. They are similar in design to quick-disconnect couplers used on pneumatic tools. Even if the valve failed and caused the short hose with the break-away to whip around wildly, keep in mind that length is very short and the height is well above any normal person's head. Also most systems operate a much lower pressures that claimed in the e-mail. Consider this: Everybody has played with a garden hose. The average garden hose operates at typical water main pressure of 35 to 80 PSI and even at that pressure the hose would blow itself out of the filler pipe if you weren't forcibly holding it in. Imagine a fuel nozzle at 150 PSI! It would take at least two rugged firefighters simply to hold the nozzle into the filler on your fender. That vision alone puts the lie to this story. If you stuck a 150 psi nozzle into an empty "jerry jug" setting on the ground and pulled the trigger, the jug would be blown clean across the parking lot assuming you weren't knocked to the ground by the reactive thrust. I suppose there is the possibility that a break-away coupler could just spontaneously part and the hose would fall to the ground. If you were standing directly under it you might be hit in the head but it would be by the force due to gravity because the pump pressure would be contained in the short portion still attached to the dispenser. It would seem to me that only two scenarios that could cause a spontaneous break-away are an incorrectly installed break-away coupler that wasn't tested, i.e. the two haves weren't fully inserted together and latched or a damaged break-away coupler that just experienced an incomplete break-away caused by a departing nitwit. Keep in mind that the second scenario would require the next customer to have to pick up the nozzle from the ground because that's where it would be laying since the nitwit drove away. Unless I'm missing something here, I just can't buy this story as it's written. I'm not writing it off entirely but it needs much more detailed specifics. One thing is for sure, they aren't commonplace as suggested in the e-mail. Also OSHA would cover any event at a full- serve station where the operator is an employee. This would also be true at non-public fleet fueling station. Even at the public self- serve stations, any event that occurred while the employees were servicing or testing the coupler would be covered by OSHA. Mark
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post