About This Archive  | DCHAS-L 2007 Index   | DCHAS-L Yearly Index
person wearing a disposable face shield and surgical style mask

Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.

Previous by Date:
Subject: Re: NFPA standards
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:51:59 -0500
Author: Diane Amell 		Next by Date:
Subject: Re: NFPA standards
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:21:24 -0400
Author: "Benedetti, Bob"


Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:02:56 -0700
Reply-To: Gordon Miller <miller22**At_Symbol_Here**LLNL.GOV>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Gordon Miller <miller22**At_Symbol_Here**LLNL.GOV>
Subject: Re: NFPA standards
In-Reply-To: <DAE1D18DA139B54CB83853D6B5F838650A13C226**At_Symbol_Here**EXCHANGEA.mgmt.ad.uconn.edu>

Unfortunately, safety can be summarized by paraphrasing Mao ze Dong. 
He said "Justice grows from the barrel of a gun." Figuratively, 
safety grows from the barrel of a gun. The gun is enforcement. Fire 
Marshals can enforce NFPA45, etc. and they have significant 
enforcement authority.

NFPA IS regulatory with more certain enforcement, via fire 
inspections, than OSHA or EPA.


>
>
>Recently our Fire Marshall began a series of Lab Inspections,
>concentrating primarily on quantities of chemicals. This required all
>the researchers to provide an inventory for the labs,  which was not a
>problem, since one is required as part of the University's Chemical
>Hygiene Plan.
>
>
>
>My question to the List is :     OSHA's Lab standard is
>performance-based, and Law;  EPA's RCRA regulations, while prescriptive,
>have become institutionalized    because no one wants a Consent Order
>(speaking from experience).    NFPA 45 is not Law, yet seems to trump
>OSHA & RCRA, because Building Codes make it appear regulatory.
>
>
>
>Even if a researcher manages his/her chemical inventory properly
>(labeling, segregating), and their hazardous wastes properly (labeling,
>segregating), it appears that the NFPA holds them to higher standards.
>Researchers are questioning this.   And even if they comply by removing
>some chemicals ,     they say they will just order more after the Fire
>Marshall inspection is completed.
>
>
>
>Are any EH &S professionals finding this a problem?
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>Stefan Wawzyniecki, CIH, CHMM      NRCC-CHO      University of
>Connecticut  Chemical Health & Safety
>
>________________________________
>
>
>
>

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post


The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.